According to Mary

That is some serious cross hatching, Mary. We name you the Empress of Encinitas in cross hatching and every other style you incorporate in your creative, powerful cartoons.

James Bond - Will You Miss?

miss /ˈmɪs/ verb - miss·es; missed; miss·ing

1 : to fail to hit, catch, reach, or get (something) [+ obj] ▪
2 [+ obj]
    a : to fail to use (something, such as an opportunity)
    b : to fail to do, take, make, or have (something)
3 [+ obj] : to be without (something) : to lack (something)
4 [+ obj]
    a : to fail to be present for (something)
    b : to arrive too late for (something or someone)
5 [+ obj] : to notice or feel the absence of (someone or something)
6 [+ obj]
    a : to fail to understand (something)
    b : to fail to hear or learn about (something)
    c : to fail to see or notice (something or someone)
7 [+ obj] : to avoid (something)
8 [no obj] : to fail to succeed
9 [no obj] : misfire
 
[phrasal verb]
1 : to lose an opportunity : to be unable to have or enjoy something
Meriam-Webster

Not a fan.  So, no . . .

The other James Bond? 

In 1966 spy author John La Carré considered 007 a neo-fascist gangster. He's softened his criticism, but I'm not sure why. 

He's a silly white male fantasy from the 60s who goes around the world, shags exotic women and spreads STDs (all done in a family friendly way).

50 years. Seriously? I don't care how good the new 007 actor is. Please retire.

Number of the Day

Five-hundred and fifty-five votes behind, five-hundred and fifty-five votes needed right now to catch up.  Plus, these same five-hundred and fifty-five people need to vote again every day for the next 9 days.

Can we do this people?

Oh yes, this is what is needed for our very own Solana Center to win the competition in the Earth 8 Eco Ambassadors contest for $25,000 prize money.

Tell everyone you know - 9 days of a simple mouse click or two to give our EUSD school kids a continued program they all love - reducing waste, composting and learning more than many parents know about the earth's natural systems.

Vote here.

Image: flickr Eve the Weaver

Let Dave Roberts explain it to your Uncle Charlie

No, not that Dave Roberts, our newest San Diego County Supervisor, Dave Roberts of Grist.

by digby

"It's a stale trope that these family holiday gatherings are fraught with political arguments. But .. they often are. We may choose to live in our tribal encalves most of the time but for an awful lot of us, the family that hatched us isn't all of the same tribe.

Anyway, for the climate change argument, get out your nifty IPAD and show this to Uncle Charlie:"

How many of us used the temperatures given in Fahrenheit are lulled by seeming low number of 2 degrees Celsius?  In reality a 2 degrees Celsius rise means 35.6 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit.  That is a horrible temperature rise, even for mild San Diego coastline temperatures. Update: Fixed math error.  This is horrible for ecosystems, tide and weather patterns, agriculture and lots of other interconnected things.  Plus it will be uncomfortable.

One can start today by changing the attitude that no waste in your life means deprivation.  This is on the personal level.  We can demand it of our new council on a local level (16 days, but who's counting?). There will be more climate change posts with email addresses and other thought provoking ideas from around the world and all over the net.

For the rest of your life make the impossible possible. Dave Roberts

Shop Local Saturday (Or Any Day)

Flying Pig Pub & Kitchen near Oceanside (h/t Teresa Barth)

The title is from the corporate (AmEx) sponsored Shop Small Saturday campaign.

Heed the local message or the big business version, if you choose to shop - go local. We want these small local businesses to stick around a long time.  

According to Mary: Robots

Dogs & Cats Living Together . . . Mass Hysteria.

Thanksgiving for millions of us prompts the un-fun aspect at the heart of dysfunctional family gatherings.

This being a political blog, it is no great stretch to simply point out the hysteria within the national and local county Republican party with the recent election results, the proverbial War on Christmas O'Reilly rants and the utter madness of demanding consumerism means success amidst deep indebtedness of U.S. families.

Or another whole movement of people who can't grasp gratitude or thanksgiving while appalled at the horrendous realities that the US of A is supporting in domestic and foreign policies. Realities show the staggering gulf between the rich and the rest of us or the horror that is Israel's U.S. supported attacks on Gaza and other foreign wars (declared and undeclared).

My deep and abiding thanks is to the voters of this community for toppling the power structure and voting in Lisa Shaffer, Tony Kranz, Dave Roberts . . .  And for ousting Stocks and Bilbray.

For this writer it prompts the dark humor of the Bill Murray character's quote about chaos from 1984 Ghostbusters dialog:

Dr. Peter Venkman: This city is headed for a disaster of biblical proportions.
Mayor: What do you mean, "biblical"?
Dr Ray Stantz: What he means is Old Testament, Mr. Mayor, real wrath of God type stuff.
Dr. Peter Venkman: Exactly.
Dr Ray Stantz: Fire and brimstone coming down from the skies! Rivers and seas boiling!
Dr. Egon Spengler: Forty years of darkness! Earthquakes, volcanoes...
Winston Zeddemore: The dead rising from the grave!
Dr. Peter Venkman: Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together... mass hysteria!
Mayor: All right, all right! I get the point!

There is evidence every year that there are those out of their minds with "buying hysteria".

The clip suggests spending time with family. Another approach, practiced here, is to simply make Thursday (and Friday) about what matters to you and your loved ones. Sometimes that means skipping it altogether, because choice matters in a deliberate life. It may just be that imposing thanks and fellowship can be hurtful to the most vulnerable.

Thanks Due for Playing Outside

For those old enough to remember and those who had the privilege of nature as a playground, childhood for many of us was a wonderous adventure during play time.

I'm now grateful that on Saturdays and in the summer I was able to play outside, anywhere in my neighborhood, all day long until I had to eat lunch or go to the bathroom or I heard Mom's dinner bell screwed onto the front of the house.

It was also a generous gift, I now realize, to be allowed to go to summer camp for a week beginning when I was 6 years old.  This annual bonanza of independence and primitive living (housed in a cabin, a tipi or a leanto) was the highlight of the year for 12 consecutive years.

Learning to swim, to canoe on the river, archery contests, lashing a handrail fence up a steep hill, apprentice counselor training, primitive 3-day camping trips and the bonding with camp friends are all cherished memories.  And nobody in my family, not parents or siblings or even my Gram could ever know what I knew or feel what I felt because it was my very special unique passion.

Of all of life's joys, this experience rises above all others as a touchstone of something.   precious and personal.  This prompts another memory of my very favorite Christmas at 10 years old when I got the sleeping bag I asked for and a world globe.

All this was heightened today with the Guardian article by George Monibiot via Truthdig.

"The remarkable collapse of children’s engagement with nature – which is even faster than the collapse of the natural world – is recorded in Richard Louv’s book Last Child in the Woods, and in a report published recently by the National Trust. Since the 1970s the area in which children may roam without supervision has decreased by almost 90%. In one generation the proportion of children regularly playing in wild places in the UK has fallen from more than half to fewer than one in 10. In the US, in just six years (1997-2003) children with particular outdoor hobbies fell by half. Eleven- to 15-year-olds in Britain now spend, on average, half their waking day in front of a screen. 

… And here we meet the other great loss. Most of those I know who fight for nature are people who spent their childhoods immersed in it. Without a feel for the texture and function of the natural world, without an intensity of engagement almost impossible in the absence of early experience, people will not devote their lives to its protection. The fact that at least half the published articles on ash dieback have been illustrated with photos of beeches, sycamores or oaks seems to me to be highly suggestive."

Encinitas has the great good fortune of a climate and natural resources of ocean, wetlands, open spaces, parks and hiking trails.  Unstructured and unsupervised play has been enjoyed by generations.  There is a great tradition of surfing, skateboarding and other sports that celebrate individual exploration outside of and addition to organized sports.

For some years now there has been a real effort on the part of activist parents, various principals and teaching staff and now the Encinitas Union School District's Green Team to incorporate nature, gardens, composting, waste education into children's learning experience.  With the help of Healthy Partners, this effort is growing. Thank you Mim and Carol and all volunteers and the school district's efforts.

Don't forget to vote today and every day until Dec. 6, for Solana Center with Happy Day partners to win the Eco Ambassadors Award of $25,000 Solana Center. Vote here.

This is a close race now between 2 groups.  Solana Center is in second place so every vote counts.

Thanks, Jesus . . .

Gratitude to Teresa Barth sharing this from Up Worthy website.

Don't forget to vote today and every day until Dec. 6, for Solana Center with Happy Day partners to win the Eco Ambassadors Award of $25,000 Solana Center. Vote here.

The Waste Project Solana Center works with Mim Michelove's Happy Day partners whose school projects are teaching the children at Encinitas Union School District about SCRAP: Separate ~ Compost ~ Reduce ~ Protect.

Finally, Running Behind This Year

Yes.  That Virginia, that was sarcasm.

Naomi Klein Explains How We Have to Dream Big

People Shock Can Deepen Democracy versus Disaster Capitalism

From Bill Moyers.com via AlterNet

full transcript below

BILL MOYERS: If you've been curious about why New York Mayor Mike Bloomberg endorsed Barack Obama for re-election, just take another look at the widespread havoc caused by the Frankenstorm benignly named Sandy. Having surveyed all this damage Bloomberg Business Week concluded: “It’s Global Warming, Stupid: If Hurricane Sandy doesn't persuade Americans to get serious about climate change, nothing will."

Well it was enough to prompt President Obama, at his press conference this week, to say more about global warming than he did all year.

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: I am a firm believer that climate change is real, that it is impacted by human behavior and carbon emissions. And as a consequence, I think we’ve got an obligation to future generations to do something about it.

BILL MOYERS: But he made it clear that actually doing something about it will take a back seat to the economy for now. He did return to New York on Thursday to review the recovery effort on Staten Island. Climate change and Hurricane Sandy brought Naomi Klein to town, too. You may know her as the author of "The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism.” Readers of two influential magazines to put Naomi Klein high on the list of the 100 leading public thinkers in the world. She is now reporting for a new book and documentary on how climate change can spur political and economic transformation. She also has joined with the environmental writer and activist Bill McKibben in a campaign launched this week called "Do the Math." More on that shortly.... First, congratulations on the baby.

NAOMI KLEIN: Thank you so much.

BILL MOYERS: How old now?

NAOMI KLEIN: He is five months today.

BILL MOYERS: First child?

NAOMI KLEIN: My first child, yeah.

BILL MOYERS: How does a child change the way you see the world?

NAOMI KLEIN: Well it lengthens your timeline definitely. I’m really immersed in climate science right now because of the project I’m working on is related to that. So you know there are always these projections into the future, you know, what's going to happen in 2050? What's going to happen in 2080? And I think when you're solo, you think, "Okay, well, how old will I be then?" Well, you know, and now I'm thinking how old will he be then, right? And so, it's not that-- but I don't like the idea that, "Okay, now I care about the future now that I have a child." I think that everybody cares about the future. And I cared about it when I didn't have a child, too.

BILL MOYERS: Well, I understand that but we're so complacent about climate change. A new study shows that while the number of people who believe it's happening has increased by, say, three percentage points over the last year, the number of people who don't think it is human caused has dropped.

NAOMI KLEIN: It has dropped dramatically. I mean, the statistics on this are quite incredible. 2007, according to a Harris poll, 71 percent of Americans believed that climate change was real, that it was human caused. And by last year, that number went down to 44 percent. 71 percent to 44 percent, that is an unbelievable drop in belief. But then you look at the coverage that the issue's received in the media. And it's also dropped dramatically from that high point. 2007, you know, this was this moment where, you know, Hollywood was on board. “Vanity Fair” launched their annual green issue.

And by the way, there hasn't been an annual green issue since 2008. Stars were showing up to the Academy Awards in hybrid cars. And there was a sense, you know, we all have to play our part, including the elites. And that has really been lost. And that's why it's got to come from the bottom up this time.

BILL MOYERS: But what do you think happened to diminish the enthusiasm for doing something about it, the attention from the press, the interest of the elite? What is it?

NAOMI KLEIN: I think we're up against a very powerful lobby. And you know, this is the fossil fuel lobby. And they have every reason in the world to prevent this from being the most urgent issue on our agenda. And I think, you know, if we look at the history of the environmental movement, going back 25 years to when this issue really broke through, you know, when James Hansen testified before Congress, that--

BILL MOYERS: The NASA scientist, yeah.

NAOMI KLEIN: Exactly, our foremost climate scientist, and said, "I believe it is happening. And I believe it is human caused." That was the moment where we could no longer deny that we knew, right? I mean, scientists actually knew what well beforehand. But that was the breakthrough moment. And that was 1988. And if we think about what else was happening in the late '80s? Well, the Berlin Wall fell the next year. And the end of history was declared. And, you know, climate change in a sense, it hit us at the worst possible historical moment. Because it does require collective action, right? It does require that we, you, regulate corporations. That you get, you know, that you plan collectively as a society. And at the moment that it hit the mainstream, all of those ideas fell into disrepute, right? It was all supposed to be free market solutions. Governments were supposed to get out of the way of corporations. Planning was a dirty word, that was what communists did, right? Anything collective was a dirty word. Margaret Thatcher said, "There's no such thing as society."

Now if you believe that, you can't do anything about climate change, because it is the essence of a collective problem. This is our collective atmosphere. We can only respond to this collectively. So the environmental movement responded to that by really personalizing the problem and saying, "Okay, you recycle. And you buy a hybrid car." And treating this like this could or we'll have business-friendly solutions like cap and trade and carbon offsetting. That doesn't work. So that's part of the problem. So you have this movement that every once in a while would rear up and people would get all excited and we're really going to do something about this. And whether it was the Rio Summit or the Copenhagen Summit or that moment when Al Gore came out with Inconvenient Truth, but then it would just recede, because it didn’t have that collective social support that it needed.

And on top of that, you have, we've had this concerted campaign by the fossil fuel lobby to both buy off the environmental movement, to defame the environmental movement, to infiltrate the environmental movement, and to spread lies in the culture. And that's what the climate denial movement has been doing so effectively.

BILL MOYERS: I read a piece just this week by the environmental writer Glenn Scherer. He took a look and finds that over the last two years, the lion's share of the damage from extreme weather, floods, tornadoes, droughts, thunder storms, wind storms, heat waves, wildfires, has occurred in Republican-leaning red states. But those states have sent a whole new crop of climate change deniers to Congress.

NAOMI KLEIN: Yeah, someone's going to have to explain Oklahoma to me, you know?

BILL MOYERS: My native state.

NAOMI KLEIN: My sister lives in Oklahoma. And, you know, it is so shocking that James Inhofe, the foremost climate denying senator is from the state that is so deeply climate effected. There was something, actually, I was-- last year I covered the Heartland Conference, which is the annual confab for all the climate deniers. And James Inhofe was supposed to be the keynote speaker. And the first morning of the conference, there was lots of buzz. He’s the rock star among the climate deniers. Inhofe is coming, he's opening up this conference, right? And the first morning the main conference organizer stands up at breakfast and lets loose the bad news that James Inhofe has called in sick and he can't make it.

And it turns out that he had gone swimming in a lake filled with blue-green algae, which is actually a climate-related issue. When lakes get too warm, this blue-green algae spreads. And he had gone swimming. And he had gotten sick from the blue-green algae. So he actually arguably had a climate-related illness and couldn't come to the climate change conference. But even though he was sick, he wrote a letter from his sickbed just telling them what a great job he was doing. So the powers of denial are amazingly strong, Bill. If you are deeply invested in this free-market ideology, you know, if you really believe with your heart and soul that everything public and anything the government does is evil and that, you know, our liberation will come from liberating corporations, then climate change fundamentally challenges your worldview, precisely because we have to regulate.

We have to plan. We can't leave everything to the free market. In fact, climate change is, I would argue, the greatest single free-market failure. This is what happens when you don't regulate corporations and you allow them to treat the atmosphere as an open sewer. So it isn't just, "Okay, the fossil fuel companies want to protect their profits." It's that it's that this science threatens a worldview. And when you dig deeper, when you drill deeper into those statistics about the drop in belief in climate change, what you see is that Democrats still believe in in climate change, in the 70th percentile. That whole drop of belief, drop off in belief has happened on the right side of the political spectrum. So the most reliable predictor of whether or not somebody believes that climate change is real is what their views are on a range of other political subjects. You know, what do you think about abortion? What is your view of taxes? And what you find is that people who have very strong conservative political beliefs cannot deal with this science, because it threatens everything else they believe.

BILL MOYERS: Do you really believe, are you convinced that there are no free-market solutions? There's no way to let the market help us solve this crisis?

NAOMI KLEIN: No, absolutely the market can play a role. There are things that government can do to incentivize the free market to do a better job, yes. But is that a replacement for getting in the way, actively, of the fossil fuel industry and preventing them from destroying our chances of a future on a livable planet? It's not a replacement.

We have to do both. Yes, we need these market incentives on the one hand to encourage renewable energy. But we also need a government that's willing to say no. No, you can't mine the Alberta tar sands and burn enough carbon that you will have game over for the climate as James Hansen has said.

BILL MOYERS: But I'm one of those who is the other end of the corporation. I mean, we had a crisis in New York the last two weeks. We couldn't get gasoline for the indispensable vehicles that get us to work, get us to the supermarket, get us to our sick friends or neighbors. I mean, the point I'm trying to make is we are all the fossil fuel industry, are we not?

NAOMI KLEIN: You know, we often hear that. We often hear that we're all equally responsible for climate change. And that it's just the rules of supply and demand.

BILL MOYERS: I have two cars. I keep them filled with gasoline.

NAOMI KLEIN: But I think the question is, you know, if there was a fantastic public transit system that really made it easy for you to get where you wanted to go, would you drive less? So I don't know about you, but I, you know, I certainly would.

BILL MOYERS: I mean, I use the subways all the time here.

NAOMI KLEIN: And if it was possible to recharge an electric vehicle, if it was as easy to do that as it is to fill up your car with gasoline, you know, if that electricity came from solar and wind, would you insist, "No, I want to fill my car with, you know, with dirty energy"? No, I don't think you would. Because this is what I think we have expressed over and over again. We are willing to make changes. You know we recycle and we compost. We ride bicycles. I mean, there there's actually been a tremendous amount of willingness and goodwill for people to change their behavior. But I think where people get demoralized is when they see, "Okay, I'm making these changes, but emissions are still going up, because the corporations aren't changing how they do business." So no, I don't think we're all equally guilty.

BILL MOYERS: President Obama managed to avoid the subject all through the campaign and he hasn’t exactly been leading the way.

NAOMI KLEIN: He has not been leading the way. And in fact, you know, he spent a lot of time on the campaign bragging about how much pipeline he's laid down and this ridiculous notion of an all of the above energy strategy, as if you can, you know, develop solar and wind alongside more coal, you know, more oil, more natural gas, and it's all going to work out in the end.

No, it doesn't add up. And, you know, I think personally, I think the environmental movement has been a little too close to Obama. And, you know, we learned, for instance, recently, about a meeting that took place shortly after Obama was elected where the message that all these big green groups got was, "We don't want to talk about climate change. We want to talk about green jobs and energy security." And a lot of these big green groups played along. So I feel--

BILL MOYERS: You mean the big environmental groups?

NAOMI KLEIN: Yeah, big environmental groups went along with this messaging, talking about energy security, instead of talking about climate change, 'cause they were told that that wasn't a winnable message. I just think it's wrong. I think it's bad strategy.

BILL MOYERS: He got reelected.

NAOMI KLEIN: He got, well, he got reelected, but you know what? I think he, I think Hurricane Sandy helped Obama get reelected.

BILL MOYERS: How so?

NAOMI KLEIN: Well, look at the Bloomberg endorsement that came at the last minute. I mean, Bloomberg endorsed Obama because of climate change. Because he believed that this was an issue that voters cared enough about that they would, that Independents would swing to Obama over climate change, and some of the polling absolutely supports this, that this was one of the reasons why people voted for Obama over Romney was that they were concerned about climate change and they felt that he was a better candidate on climate change.

The truth was, we didn't have a good candidate. We had a terrible, terrible candidate on climate change, and we had a candidate on climate change who needs a lot of pressure. So I feel more optimistic than I did in 2008, because I think in 2008 the attitude of the environmental movement was, "Our guy just got in and we need to support him. And he's going to give us the legislation that we, that we want. And we're going to take his advice. And we're going to be good little soldiers."

And now maybe I'm being overly optimistic, but I think that people learned the lesson of the past four years. And people now understand that what Obama needs or what we need, forget what Obama needs, is a real independent movement with climate change at its center and that's going to put pressure on the entire political class and directly on the fossil fuel companies on this issue. And there's no waiting around for Obama to do it for you.

BILL MOYERS: Why would you think that the next four years of a lame duck president would be more successful from your standpoint than the first four years, when he's looking to reelection?

NAOMI KLEIN: Well, I think on the one hand, we're going to see more direct action. But the other strategy is to go where the problem is. And the problem is the companies themselves. And we’re launching the “Do the Math” tour which is actually trying to kick off a divestment movement. I mean, we're going after these companies where it hurts, which is their portfolios, which is their stock price.

BILL MOYERS: You're asking people to disinvest, to take their money out of, universities in particular, right? This is what happened during the fight against apartheid in South Africa and ultimately proved successful.

NAOMI KLEIN: Yeah, and this is, we are modeling it on the anti-apartheid divestment movement. And the reason it's called “Do the Math” is because of this new body of research that came out last year. A group in Britain called “The Carbon Tracker Initiative.” And this is, you know, a fairly conservative group that addresses itself to the financial community. This is not, you know, sort of activist research. This is a group that identified a market bubble and were concerned about this meant to investors. So it's a pretty conservative take on it. And what the numbers that they crunched found is that if we are going to ward off truly catastrophic climate change, we need to keep the increase, the temperature increase, below 2 degrees centigrade.

NAOMI KLEIN: The problem with that is that they also measured how much the fossil fuel companies and countries who own their own national oil reserves have now currently in their reserves, which means they have already laid claim to this. They already own it. It's already inflating their stock price, okay? So how much is that? It's five times more. So that means that the whole business model for the fossil fuel industry is based on burning five times more carbon than is compatible with a livable planet. So what we're saying is, "Your business model is at war with life on this planet. It's at war with us. And we need to fight back."

So we're saying, "These are rogue companies. And we think in particular young people whose whole future lies ahead of them have to send a message to their universities, who, and, you know, almost every university has a huge endowment. And there isn't an endowment out there that doesn't have holdings in these fossil fuel companies. And so young people are saying to the people who charged with their education, charged with preparing them for the outside world, for their future jobs, "Explain to me how you can prepare me for a future that with your actions you're demonstrating you don't believe in. How can you prepare me for a future at the same time as you bet against my future with these fossil fuel holdings? You do the math and you tell me." And I think there's a tremendous moral clarity that comes from having that kind of a youth-led movement. So we're really excited about it.

BILL MOYERS: What do you mean rogue corporations? You're talking about Chevron and Exxon-Mobil and BP and all of these huge capitalist or institutions.

NAOMI KLEIN: Well, rogue corporations, because their business model involves externalizing the price of their waste onto the rest of us. So their business model is based on not having to pay for what they think of as an externality, which is the carbon that's spewed into the atmosphere that is warming the planet. And that price is enormous. We absolutely know that the future is going to be filled with many more such super storms and many more such costly, multibillion-dollar disasters. It's already happening. Last year was-- there were more billion-dollar disasters than any year previously. So climate change is costing us. And yet you see this squabbling at, you know, the state level, at the municipal level, over who is going to pay for this

NAOMI KLEIN: The public sector doesn't have the money to pay for what these rogue corporations have left us with, the price tag of climate change. So we have to do two things. We have to make sure that it doesn't get worse, that the price tag doesn’t get higher. And we need to get some of that money back, which means, you know, looking at issues like fossil fuel subsidies and, you know, to me, it's so crazy. I mean, here we are post-Hurricane Sandy. Everyone is saying, "Well, maybe this is going to be our wakeup call." And right now in New York City, the debate is over how much to increase fares in public transit. And they want to, the Metro Transit Authority wants to increase the price of riding the subway, you know, the price of riding the trains, quite a bit. And so how does this make sense? We're supposedly having a wakeup call about climate change. And we're making it harder for people to use public transit. And that's because we don't have the resources that we need.

BILL MOYERS: You've been out among the areas of devastation. Why?

NAOMI KLEIN: Well, for this book I'm currently writing about climate change and a documentary to go with it, so we were filming in the Rockaways, which is one of the hardest-hit areas and Staten Island and in Red Hook. And also in the relief hubs, where you see just a tremendous number of volunteers organized by, actually, organized by Occupy Wall Street. They call it Occupy Sandy.

BILL MOYERS: Really?

NAOMI KLEIN: Yes. And what I found is that people are—the generosity is tremendous, the humanity is tremendous. I saw a friend last night, and I asked her whether she'd been involved in the hurricane relief. And she said, "Yeah, I gave them my car. I hope I get it back. If you see it, tell me." So people are tremendous.

BILL MOYERS: This means--

NAOMI KLEIN: So one of the things that you find out in a disaster is you really do need a public sector. It really important. And coming back to what we were talking about earlier, why is climate change so threatening to people on the conservative end of the political spectrum? One of the things it makes an argument for is the public sphere. You need public transit to prevent climate change. But you also need a public health care system to respond to it. It can't just be ad hoc. It can't just be charity and goodwill.

BILL MOYERS: When you use terms like “collective action,” “central planning,” you scare corporate executive and the American Enterprise Institute and The Heritage Foundation because they say you want to do away with capitalism.

NAOMI KLEIN: Well, first of all, I don't use a phrase like "central planning." I talk about planning, but I don't think it should be central. And one of the things that one must admit when looking at climate change is that the only thing just as bad or maybe even worse for the climate than capitalism was communism. And when we look at the carbon emissions for the eastern bloc countries, they were actually, in some cases, worse than countries like Australia or Canada. So, let's just call it a tie. So we need to look for other models. And I think there needs to be much more decentralization and a much deeper definition of democracy than we have right now.

BILL MOYERS: Decentralization of what, Naomi?

NAOMI KLEIN: Well, for instance, you know, if we think about renewable energy, well, one of the things that's happened is that when you try to get wind farms set up, really big wind farms, there's usually a lot of community resistance that's happened in the United States. It's happened in Britain. Where it hasn't happened is Germany and Denmark. And the reason for that is that in those places you have movements that have demanded that the renewable energy be community controlled, not centrally planned, but community controlled. So that there's a sense of ownership, not by some big, faceless state, but by the people who actually live in the community that is impacted.

BILL MOYERS: You've written that climate change has little to do with the state of the environment, but much to do with the state of capitalism and transforming the American economic system. And you see an opening with Sandy, right?

NAOMI KLEIN: I do see an opening, because, you know, whenever you have this kind of destruction, there has to be a reconstruction. And what I documented in “The Shock Doctrine” is that these right-wing think tanks, like the ones you named, like the American Enterprise Institute or the Cato Institute, the Heritage Foundation, they historically have gotten very, very good at seizing these moments of opportunity to push through their wish list of policies.

And often their wish list of policies actually dig us deeper into crisis. If I can just-- if you'll bear with me, I'll just give you one example. After Hurricane Katrina, there was a meeting at the Heritage Foundation, just two weeks after the storm hit. Parts of the city were still underwater. And there was a meeting, the “Wall Street Journal” reported on it. And I got the minutes from the meeting.

The heading was 31 free market solutions for Hurricane Katrina. And you go down the list and it was: and don't reopen the public schools, replace the public schools with vouchers. And drill for oil in ANWAR, in the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve, more oil refineries. So what kind of free market solutions are these, right?

Here you have a crisis that was created by a collision between heavy weather (which may or may not have been linked to climate change, but certainly it's what climate change looks like) colliding with weak infrastructure, because of years and years of neglect. And the free market solutions to this crisis are, "Let's just get rid of the public infrastructure altogether and drill for more oil, which is the root cause of climate change." So that's their shock doctrine. And I think it's time for a people's shock.

BILL MOYERS: People’s shock?

NAOMI KLEIN: A people's shock, which actually we've had before, as you know, where, you know, if you think about 1929 and the market shock, and the way in which the public responded. They wanted to get at the root of the problem. And they wanted to get away from speculative finance and that's how we got some very good legislation passed in this country like Glass-Steagall, and much of the social safety net was born in that moment. Not by exploiting crisis to horde power for the few and to ram through policies that people don't want, but to build popular movements and to really deepen democracy.

BILL MOYERS: Well, the main thesis of “Shock Doctrine,” which came out five years ago before the great crash was that disaster capitalism exploits crises in order to move greater wealth to the hands of the fewer and fewer people. You don't expect those people to change their appetites do you or their ways do you, because we face a climate crisis?

NAOMI KLEIN: I don't expect them to. I wrote “The Shock Doctrine” because I believe that we, I believed at the time that we didn't understand this tactic. We didn't understand that during times of crisis certain sectors of the business world and the political class take advantage of our disorientation in order to ram through these policies. And I believed, at the time, that if we understood it, you know, if we had a name for it, if we had a word, a language for it, then the next time they tried it, we would fight back. Because the whole tactic is about taking advantage of our disorientation in those moments of crisis. And the fact that we often can become childlike and look towards, you know, a supposed expert class and leaders to take care of us. And we become too trusting, frankly, during disasters.

BILL MOYERS: It used to be said that weather, now global warming, climate change, was the great equalizer. It affected rich and poor alike. You don’t think it does, do you?

NAOMI KLEIN: What I'm seeing. And I've seen this, you know--I've been tracking this now for about six years, more and more, there's a privatization of response to disaster, where I think that wealthy people understand that, yes, we are going to see more and more storms. We live in a turbulent world. It's going to get even more turbulent. And they're planning. So you have, for instance private insurance companies now increasingly offer what they call a concierge service. The first company that was doing this was A.I.G. And in the midst of the California wildfires about six years ago, for the first time, you saw private firefighters showing up at people's homes, spraying them in fire retardant, so that when the flames came, this house would stay. This mansion, usually, would be standing and the one next door might burn to the ground. So this is extraordinary. Because we would tend to think of, you know, firefighting. This is definitely, you know, a public good. This is definitely something that people get equally. But now we're finding that even that there's even a sort of two-tiering of protection from wildfires.

BILL MOYERS: Yeah, there was even a short-lived airline in Florida I read about that offered five-star evacuation service in events of hurricanes.

NAOMI KLEIN: After Hurricane Katrina a company in Florida saw a market opportunity. And they decided to offer a charter airline that would turn your hurricane into a luxury vacation. That was actually the slogan. They would let you know when a hurricane was headed for your area. They would pick you up in a limousine, drive you to the airport, and whisk you up. And they would make you five star hotel reservations at the destination of your choice. So, you know, why does a hurricane have to be bad news after all?

BILL MOYERS: And this kind of privatization is what you wrote about in “Shock Doctrine,” that privatization of resources, monopolization of resources by the rich, in times of crisis, further divide us as a society

NAOMI KLEIN: Absolutely. And, you know, one of the things about deregulated capitalism is that it is a crisis creation machine, you know? You take away all the rules and you are going to have serial crises. They may be economic crises, booms and busts. Or there will be ecological crises. You're going to have both. You're just going to have shock after shock after shock. And the more, the longer this goes on, the more shocks you're going to have.

And the way we're currently responding to it is that with each shock, we become more divided. And the more we understand that this is what the future looks like, the more those who can afford it protect themselves and buy their way out of having to depend on the public sector and therefore are less invested in these collective responses. And that's why there has to be a whole other way of responding to this crisis.

BILL MOYERS: You wrote recently that climate change can be a historic moment to usher in the next great wave of progressive change.

NAOMI KLEIN: It can be and it must be. I mean, it's our only chance. I believe it's the biggest challenge humanity has ever faced. And we've been kidding ourselves about what it's going to take to get our emissions down to the extent that they need to go down. I mean, you talk about 80 percent lowering emissions. I mean, that is such a huge shift.

And I think that's part of the way in which, and I don't mean to beat up on the big environmental groups, because they do fantastic work. But I think that part of the reason why public opinion on this issue has been so shaky is that it doesn't really add up to say to the public, you know, "This is a huge problem. It's Armageddon." You know, you have “Inconvenient Truth.” You scare the hell out of people. But then you say, "Well, the solution can be very minor. You can change your light bulb. And we'll have this complicated piece of legislation called cap and trade that you don't really understand, but that basically means that companies here can keep on polluting, but they're going to trade their carbon emissions. And, you know, somebody else is going to plant trees on the other side of the planet and they'll get credits."

And people look at that going, "Okay, if this was a crisis, wouldn't be we be responding more aggressively? So wouldn't we be responding in a way that you have, we've responded in the past during war times, where there's been, you know, that kind of a collective sense of shared responsibility?" Because I think when we really do feel that sense of urgency about an issue, and I believe we should feel it about climate change, we are willing to sacrifice. We have shown that in the past. But when you hold up a supposed emergency and actually don't ask anything of people, anything major, they actually think you might be lying, that it might not really be an emergency after all. So if this is an emergency, we have to act like it. And yeah, it is a fundamental challenge. But the good news is, you know, we get to have a future for our kids.

Homeless Among Us

Update: Earlier I reported the CRC as the Del Mar event sponsor. From the Coast News,

"The Alliance for Regional Services (ARS), a collaboration of North County agencies and philanthropic organizations that combine resources to provide better services for the homeless at a cheaper cost, hosted the event for the second year in a row."

Councilwoman Barth and soon to be Councilwoman Shaffer are both involved in Community Resource Center (CRC) activities. Barth has put out a call to find volunteers for the Holiday basket effort and Shaffer just finished donating her campaign volunteers donations to CRC.  Today I read about the recent event at the Del Mar Fairground to provide services to the homeless.

The CRC is a part of countywide efforts to go beyond charity. From an article last May in NCT:  

"The group's main focus has been its winter homeless shelter program, but two weeks ago, alliance members held a workshop to expand its vision and mission.”

"How do we identify emerging needs and gaps in services, and create solutions for those?" Stump said the group also wants the alliance to be seen as an advocacy group for North County, becoming more strategic than reactive. “

At Our Mayor post, Hand Back the Keys to the Car, I wrote about public sentiment being likened to a thoughtless teenager, a brat when I read the article's comments.  It is time to bring humanity back into our common cultural language.  If we pay attention to the most vulnerable of our communities, we'll be able to identify and strengthen our resilience to the ongoing stresses for all: debt, disease, unemployment, mental health, family discord and political importance.

Bureau of Labor statistics (though somewhat improved) aren't that wonderful in this long-running recession looks particularly bad for marginalized voters of color, women and teenagers. Most everyone, whether well off or struggling, knows someone whether a relative, co-worker or friend who is in some dire straights.

As a community it would behoove us to bring this reality into our discussions of local economic transitions.  More minimum wage employment in national chain businesses are the death of communities.  How do we wean ourselves off this desperate dependency? It's not a simple answer because the old models are broken.

The following video via Treehugger is a brain tease and a design highlight in looking at commerce and storefront design much differently.

When Curro Claret was commissioned by Camper to redo one of their Barcelona shoe stores, he decided to let a group of people in risk of social exclusion have a go at it. The result of this open design project is a very positive one. Together with Arrels Fundació, Curro Claret and the group of ex-homeless people designed and built a new shop interior almost exclusively from recycled materials.

.

Grand Bargain

Nationwide the progressives who elected Barack Obama to a second term are poised with facts and documented sources to fight the President. It is understood that his pattern if not stated intention is to negotiate with the Republicans in the House and the Senate over the fiscal cliff - that isn't a fiscal cliff in reality. The falsely named Grand Bargain involves the Simpson Bowles report and (among other things) the recommended cuts to Social Security, Medicare and Medicade.

These three programs are the most important contributions to the 20th century US of A and progressives will be calling, petitioning, demonstrating, tweeting, blogging, interviewing, filming and fighting for facts.  Those things have nothing to do with the deficit. The defense spending and the Bush tax cuts due to end in December are where the money needs to come from, not on the backs of the most vulnerable and the middle class.

How is this related to our local issues?  Above all, Social Security checks are a major part of any community's steady income during this recession and this is especially true with the numbers of Baby Boomers going into retirement now.  Regardless of our local economy's ups and downs, the SS checks are being used each and every week all over town.  Medicare and Medicade are the same story for our local economy and especially our healthcare professionals, pharmacies and Scripps hospital.

More from NYT economist Paul Krugman with some good excerpts here.

[ . . . ] Mr. Obama should hang tough, declaring himself willing, if necessary, to hold his ground even at the cost of letting his opponents inflict damage on a still-shaky economy. And this is definitely no time to negotiate a “grand bargain” on the budget that snatches defeat from the jaws of victory. 

In saying this, I don’t mean to minimize the very real economic dangers posed by the so-called fiscal cliff that is looming at the end of this year if the two parties can’t reach a deal. Both the Bush-era tax cuts and the Obama administration’s payroll tax cut are set to expire, even as automatic spending cuts in defense and elsewhere kick in thanks to the deal struck after the 2011 confrontation over the debt ceiling. And the looming combination of tax increases and spending cuts looks easily large enough to push America back into recession. 

Nobody wants to see that happen. Yet it may happen all the same, and Mr. Obama has to be willing to let it happen if necessary. [ . . . ]

It’s worth pointing out that the fiscal cliff isn’t really a cliff. It’s not like the debt-ceiling confrontation, where terrible things might well have happened right away if the deadline had been missed. This time, nothing very bad will happen to the economy if agreement isn’t reached until a few weeks or even a few months into 2013. So there’s time to bargain. 

[ . . . ] Republicans are defying the will of the American people. And he just won his big election and is, therefore, far better placed than before to weather any political blowback from economic troubles — especially when it would be so obvious that these troubles were being deliberately inflicted by the G.O.P. in a last-ditch attempt to defend the privileges of the 1 percent.

Most of all, standing up to hostage-taking is the right thing to do for the health of America’s political system. 

So stand your ground, Mr. President, and don’t give in to threats. No deal is better than a bad deal.

Good idea, great response & fantastic results

It started with Lisa Shaffer's good idea to deal with the pollution that is the yard sign post-election by asking all supporters to drop off signs at two location. She found organizational support from Councilwoman Barth and other key volunteers and the community of Shaffer and Kranz voters brought 400 signs. These Shaffer signs, towering over little miss Levan, will be repurposed. The paper signs were recycled and the metal stands will be sold back to the local printer.

The added bonus was this great haul of food donated at the sign drop-off site at Lisa's request, shown here in her car, before she headed to the Community Resource Center.

These photos were on Shaffer's Facebook page and are shown here for those not on Facebook and to simply enjoy this progressive approach to make simple acts say large things. I look forward to the model of hundreds of small, simple ways we can all help each other choose easy ways to live deliberately. Gratitude hardly covers it for our new Councilwoman and that dynamic cadre of volunteers.

You Are Not A Loan.

 Rolling Jubilee Website:

A bailout of the people by the people

Rolling Jubilee is a Strike Debt project that buys debt for pennies on the dollar, but instead of collecting it, abolishes it. Together we can liberate debtors at random through a campaign of mutual support, good will, and collective refusal. Debt resistance is just the beginning. Join us as we imagine and create a new world based on the common good, not Wall Street profits.

Learn more or contribute.

77.5% Of US Households Are In Debt

62% Of All Bankruptcies Are Caused By A Medical Illness

Student Tuition Debt Is Over $1,000,000,000,000

1 In Every 7 US Citizens Are Pursued By Debt Collectors

The Ratio of Household Debt to Income Is 154%

40% of Indebted Households Used Credit Cards To Pay For Basic Living Expenses

A couple of the many videos available on the Rolling Jubilee website.

We Got This

This weekend a bunch of the supporters for Lisa Shaffer responded to her campaign request to bring yard signs to a couple drop off points.  Supporters were also asked to bring food donations for Community Resource Center.

She and others worked with different sources to find a place to sell back the wire sign holders, a place to donate the placticized signs for repurposing, and the paper signs for recycling.

Besides this being a good idea, it yet again shows the importance of a ground organization where people trust each other, follow through on good ideas, spread the work load and have a good time doing it. Lisa and Tony were out of town, yet this effort was handled with enthusiasm. Signs for Shaffer, Kranz & Roberts and a few others were all part of the mix along with the food donations.

This is a segue to a very big national story we posted about yesterday, the growing importance of Inter-Occupy or Occupy Sandy ground operation and organization. It has taken the Occupy movement more than a year and thousands of meetings, conflict resolutions, communication training and unending patience around the country to keep working through the realities of what community really means.  This demonstrates their unbelievable success of being able to do and not just talk.

As Abby Zimet of Common Dreams writes,

With thousands still without power, water and heat in the New York area, Occupy Sandy's ongoing and ever-expanding relief effort has been hailed as Occupy's finest hour and a triumph of doing over talking - one so efficient they're now training National Guard and city representatives of the same administration that not so long ago was hassling and pepper-spraying them. Evolution is real. So is the notion of mutual aid. Cool video.

Gone in Minutes, Devastation Lasts a Long Time

Remember a couple of weeks ago how Shaffer and Kranz were set up at their campaign launch press event with two strangers carrying Occupy signs? Remember how Mike Andreen comment trolling and anonymous mailers supporting Stocks and Muir sent around fake headlines, ideas and images of Occupy riots to smear Shaffer and Kranz as extremists? As Shaffer said long before this and during these attacks, learning about Occupy Wall Street and the Tea Party were of course something she was interested in learning about in this campaign.

Sadly, like so many other positive forces for democracy demonized by the mighty media Wurlitzer of rightwing fear blasting misinformation at an anxious conservative base, our candidates had to put distance between themselves and any kind of dissent that could be negatively construed in the last days.

It's how campaigns work when the opposition party leaders refuse to publicly denounce the use of lies and incendiary images and rhetoric to manipulate.  It's dumbing down critical thought and culturally perpetuating their base's worst instincts.

How stupid are these guys? For the past week we have been reading a seeing the remarkable work of Inter-Occupy groups in New York City. Interview from Smart Planet follows:

Back in October of 2011, it was hard to predict that Occupy Wall Street would reappear, just over a year later, as a hurricane relief effort outshining the Red Cross and FEMA in the immediate aftermath of the storm.
[ . . .]
One of your organizers, Joan Donovan, said Occupy Sandy Relief is “truly a 21st Century relief organization“. This sentiment has been repeated by media outlets over the past week. What are the characteristics of Occupy Sandy Relief that separate it from larger organizations like FEMA and the Red Cross?

Andrea Ciannavei: FEMA and the Red Cross have to deal with a lot of bureaucracy. Occupy has a network of organizers who are already there and have access to local community groups. Someone can show up, get sensitivity training, and offer support an hour later. 

Occupy Sandy also asks for in-kind donations first – supplies, generators, food, clothes – things that people can actually give and use right away. While FEMA and the Red Cross have substantial resources, they may not be able to deploy them in less than 24 hours. 

Michael Badger: Over the past year Occupy has developed a community of trust. We had to work to develop that. But now we all know each other so we united around Occupy Sandy very quickly. We don’t need to spend time managing each other because of this level of trust. 

It seems like a lot of Sandy Relief is happening without residents, press, or the city knowing who is in charge. Should we be re-imagining what leadership looks like? 

Michael Badger: I absolutely think so. A leader in the traditional sense is somebody who figures things out and tells people what to do. One of the things we talk about is shared leadership. This means supporting each other to be leaders and to lead along side each other. We need to afford communities to be able to really stand on their own.

The truth is that Occupy has taken many different forms of the 99%'s fundamental needs for community involvement and protest across the country, most notably protecting families in foreclosure actions. The other desperately needed relief in our nation is debt relief for the young, specifically school loan debt.  Here is the solution that is ready to roll out thanks to Occupy groups across the country.

Even with all of the challenges, these involved people have found it is a remarkable thing to be alive right now.

Happy Day

Let us all enjoy the delicious fruits of our labors, rest, reflect, celebrate and enjoy! 

Taking a break . . .

A little humor from the Onion:

To take the White House, a candidate must secure 270 electoral votes; however, candidates can win various other prizes by reaching different predetermined vote totals. Here’s a look at the prizes up for grabs in this year’s election:
4 electoral votes — Federal Election Commission keychain
10 electoral votes — American flag pencil set
25 electoral votes — “Don’t Tread On Me” temporary tattoo
75 electoral votes — A $25 iTunes gift card
90 electoral votes — Founding Fathers sticker set
225 electoral votes — Presidential Seal fleece blanket
320 electoral votes — A fitted 'Commander-in-Chief' baseball cap
360 electoral votes — Bald eagle (Note: Ronald Reagan is the only man to ever win a bald eagle.)

Good News - Patch is covering the Encintias election results returns in the next hour or so.

Or you can check results for Encinitas directly at the San Diego Registrar site here.

Last Minute Voters' Guide to Propositions

No on K, Yes on L, No on M

Election Day Policy and Procedures

• No campaign signs of any kind (lawn, car stickers, T-shirts, etc) are allowed in or within 100 feet of a polling station.

• Outside of 100 feet, anything goes (in relation to electioneering)

• Report if there is any problem with access to a polling station between 7 AM and 8 PM, or any suspected interference or violation.

• Call the Registrar of Voters Hotline 858 565-3360. 

• They will send a Trouble-Shooter to investigate.

• You should also inform the Precinct Inspector who is inside each Poll site and is in charge there.

More Endorsements

Women Leaders Endorse Shaffer & Kranz

Well known to Encinitas resident, Attorney Livia Borak gives a thoughtful endorsement for Lisa Shaffer and Tony Kranz. Livia can be seen on many of the clips at encinitasyouneedus channel of YouTube.  She has spoken often in her role as attorney and as a citizen on many quality of life issues.

Encinitas 101 Official Voice Carris Rhodes is really enthusiastic about Lisa Shaffer's understanding of the relationship between economy, ecology and society.  Carris has been a leading voice in the Encinitas Environmental Commission.

Henri - Politique

Back by popular demand . . .

Councilwoman Barth with constituent cat.

Kook Gathering of Waving Supporters

Tony Kranz was out and about this week with Lisa Shaffer at meet and greets.  These 2 candidates have been going non-stop.  While in Cardiff on Friday Tony let interested people know that sign waving was going to be happening on Saturday.

Well, Saturday was a gorgeous day and a whole crowd showed up - working to perfect their "wave" routine at the foot of the Kook statue.  Honking brought the expected grins and cheers. The dozens of bikes clubs and crowds walking along 101 were especially fun.

Tomorrow morning and afternoon there will be supporters for Shaffer and Kranz on busy commute routes. See you there!

Along with candidates Shaffer and Kranz, Councilwoman Barth was again waving a giant hand at the people in traffic. The Kook location, her recommendation (Good idea) as she and her husband, Don, are proud of the Cardiffian community character.  Community character has grown in framing what is most important in this election.  Images below from Barths FB page.