TONIGHT!
Both Tony Kranz and Lisa Shaffer are among the sponsors.
"This election is about preserving what is wonderful in Encinitas and making good decisions about the future - land use, traffic, environment, business, financial management, and our overall quality of life. A few hours now could make a big difference in the next four years."Stay with me on this one, this Tell-A-Vision post on permaculture does relate. Shaffer's quote above seemed a fitting way to say we don't have to view all of these areas in isolation and divided into separate issues as has been the way for so long. Shaffer is a leader in sustainability, so I know she sees these connections that Councilwoman Barth, council's only strong advocate for sustainability currently. If these two were joined by Tony Kranz there would be real advocacy for healthy food and all the other connections. On his Facebook page he says,
"Please like the page at the link below. It's an organization on a mission to change the world by helping kids to learn healthy eating habits. I think it's very worthwhile and believe you will too. Encinitas local Mim Michelove and her business partner Camille Sowinski are doing great work with the teachers and administrators at our elementary schools." Healthy Day PartnersGood decision making would rely on the ability to "learn, unlearn and relearn" what our community needs to thrive in the 21st century. Good decision making dismisses "truthiness" for the shallow and short term posturing of the status quo measured in spread sheets alone. Good decision making takes what is at hand, be it people or resources and increases value by utilizing everything possible. No mocking or belittling or marginalizing or blaming or attacking ever helped individuals or a community to flourish. That includes hippy bashing too.
"Vegetation is the solution. The more you replicate the natural environment the better it is. This is where we need to get this storm water, this runoff addressed - in the landscape plan. Mother Nature knows how to do it, so let's step back and try to replicate that more than big drain pipes, curbs, gutters and pavers."Part 2
"General plans are often called a city’s constitution…a statement of who we are and what we value as a community.Twenty-four years ago when the first General Plan for Encinitas was written, a local news source, The Beach News, precursor to The Coast News published an article with the local citizen's key concern in the title, "Will high-priced housing run residents out of town?" Twenty-five people showed up for the meeting organized to by city officials to question the future of the new city of Encinitas.
The State of California requires all cities to adopt a general plan that includes required elements – Land Use, Housing, Circulation, Resource Management, Noise and Public Safety. The city also included an optional element – Recreation and Public Health is also proposed. The plan also states community goals for how the city should grow (or not grow) in the future.
There’s not been a comprehensive review and update of the General Plan since it was written over 25 years ago. A variety of state laws, court rulings and new issues such as sustainability and climate change have made it difficult to simply “tweak” sections and maintain internally consistent policies throughout the plan."
"I think this is a potential problem, he added. "The character of he community comes from those non-classical types of people who live here. I want to keep these people here."
Another resident agreed, explaining that she had spent the last several weeks apartment hunting for a friend. "A two-bedroom apartment costs from at least $600 to $1,000," she said. "People who are just starting out are being forced to move to San Marcos because they can't find reasonable housing here."Twenty-four years later it seems that particular strategy, if it was one, worked. Wish we had the figures on the numbers of people who were forced to move due to an inflated housing bubble, rising costs, upzoning or low paying jobs, especially for young people starting out.
"Bike lanes, transit and higher density are evil because they give people alternatives to cars, and that can never happen in America."
Fundamentally, that is what is happening here. Big Oil is paying for CFACT and either directly or indirectly the fight against Agenda 21; The Kochs are promoting it like mad, right across the country. Same big companies, same reason: to keep America in its happy motoring ways, to make any alternative just about impossible. And that is how we have to paint them: not concerned citizens worried about the United Nations, but representatives of big oil out to preserve their turf.In practical terms some will never be able to hear the facts of who is paying for this and their financial stakes. Passion and groupthink can swamp judgement (and that is counted on by these groups). But it is completely unacceptable for a public servant like Kristin Gaspar to claim support of environmental goals on the one hand and promote lies regarding sustainability on the other.
"Voting's not just your right — it's also your responsibility. Women's votes make the key difference on issues ranging from fair pay to reproductive health to social safety net programs like child care assistance, Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid."
Magical Intent is the principle by which someone who has said or done something offensive, hurtful, rage-making, marginalizing, and/or otherwise contemptible argues that the person to whom they've said or done it has no right to be offended, hurt, enraged, alienated, and/or otherwise disdainful because their intent was not to generate that reaction.
In other words: "I didn't intend for you to feel that way, so if you do feel that way, don't blame me! My intent magically inoculates me from responsibility for what I actually said and how it was received!"
This is one of the most harmful—and common—manifestations of accountability deflecting language, rooted in the false contention that intent is more important than effect. It is a most curious habit, given that most of us would readily acknowledge that "I didn't mean it" isn't an excuse for not having to apologize when we bump into someone or accidentally step on someone's foot. Yet we have nonetheless created an entirely different standard for things we say that inadvertently hurt other people.
Intent does not, in fact, magically render us unaccountable from the effects of our communication, no more than not intending to step on someone's toes magically renders us unaccountable from the effects of our movement. Pain caused unintentionally is still authentic pain.
McEwan adds, "That's a difficult notion to accept for most of us, because most of us have engaged in this type of harmful communication at some point in our lives, even if it's not a regular habit. Even being presented with the idea that common defensiveness can be abusive is likely to elicit, in some readers, a magical intent response: I don't intend to abuse or manipulate people, so there's no way I'm doing it!
But that's why this conversation is so important—because a lack of intent to harm doesn't guarantee that one will never harm."In this 2012 campaign this citizen tip is important on a number of levels. Besides the simple humanity of caring if we cause harm there is the practical aspect of running a campaign that boldly states an alternative of openness, civility and respect that welcomes the many voices in our community needs to champion healthy communication. Lisa Shafer and Tony Kranz have spoken out in the city council and in speeches, meet-ups, their websites, in commentaries about this very aspect of a need for change in Encinitas. Councilwoman Barth has sat through years of harmful communication without sinking to those levels with her council members, as dozens of video clips demonstrate. And we want dozens more to join this campaign against big money opposition. We can ill afford to alienate anyone or instill fear in those trying to speak up, speak out and do what they can to move us to that goal.
"If someone I trusted has deliberately hurt me, this adds the layer of it being a betrayal - and the more trusted/intimate, the bigger that betrayal. It's not that the lack of intent lessens the hurt, for me; it's that knowledge of intent makes it much, much worse, as it means my trust has been broken."Using the press, blogs and public gatherings to demand someone in your circle of activists respond as you would have them is hurtful and politically stupid. We can ill afford to alienate the very few who are awake and energized to what goes on at Encinitas City Hall.
"And, you know, the funny thing is that, in my experience, it's exceedingly easier to apologize in a meaningful way when you view yourself as a complicated person, with virtues and flaws, good instincts and bad habits, the capacity for kindness and a reservoir of internalized ugliness.
When I acknowledge fucking up and apologize, I don't feel like I'm "giving away" something about myself, as if it's some mystery that I'm not perfect. It used to feel that way before I fully embraced the idea of knowing and caring about myself in all my sometimes regrettable aspects.
This dynamic -- evil vs. complex -- can be really harmful in interpersonal relationships, too. I have found that accountability denying language is frequently invoked by members of my family who interpret "you hurt me" as "you're a bad person" and/or "you don't love me," which extends from their own inability to exist comfortably as a person with visible and acknowledged flaws.
That also tends to lead to a cycle of abuse, because if one resists seeing oneself as someone with flawed communication about which one needs to be vigilant, one makes the same mistakes over and over, then deflects with harmful language over and over.
And after someone communicates enough times that you're responsible for the hurt they cause you, the only choice with which you're left to break that cycle is to disengage."
Archbishop Desmond Tutu explained Ubuntu in 2008: One of the sayings in our country is Ubuntu – the essence of being human. Ubuntu speaks particularly about the fact that you can't exist as a human being in isolation. It speaks about our interconnectedness. You can't be human all by yourself, and when you have this quality – Ubuntu – you are known for your generosity. We think of ourselves far too frequently as just individuals, separated from one another, whereas you are connected and what you do affects the whole World. When you do well, it spreads out; it is for the whole of humanity.The source of this TED Talk was an article titled "Rethinking Growth" from newdream.org, a link provided by Councilwoman Barth in her newsletter last week. These are valuable resources and potential community strengthening conversations we could be having. First we need a new city council with open minds like Lisa Shaffer and Tony Kranz. Lisa's website has addressed some of these very themes.